Existencecentrism

Peter Klevius 'existencecentrism' (1992:21-22, ISBN 9173288411) vs 'existentialism'. Sören Kierkegaard: 'Human reason has boundaries'. Peter Klevius: There cannot be any boundaries because our existencecentrism excludes us from defining one. A boundary implies something outside it. However, our existencecentrism gives us no access outside our mind. This means existentialists conflate their "boundary" with a semantic construction inside their mind. Jean-Paul Sartre opposed defining human beings as primarily rational, and asserted that people make decisions based on subjective meaning rather than pure rationality. Peter Klevius: Humans can only be rational because they are strapped to the content of their mind. Irrationality and subjectivity only exist between human minds.
Dear reader, Google is (20241231) censoring all of Peter Klevius tousands of images, incl. his own drawing of his groundbreaking theory on consciousness and how the brain works from 1992-94, which was empirically proven correct by the birth (2006) of a unique set of craniopagus twins with coupled thalamuses (they can talk with eachother inside their head) but separate cortices (i.e. separate personaities) - an image that is constantly high up on other search engines!

Trying to understand the polarizing and warmongering without incl. the consequences of US 1971 $-theft - which are now coming home to roost because of China's superior R&D - is an equation without an x. From a pro-war politician's mouth always comes a copy of the original in US. US inflamed the existing racial tensions in Ukraine for the purpose of getting US nukes and US anti-nuke missiles on Russia's border, so to protect itself in its planned war against China - because only by creating a similar chaos as in WW2 on the Eurasian continent would US be able to continue its stolen dollar hegemony.
From US "exorbitant dollar privilege" (financial abuse of vulnerable countries - but the dollar still connected to gold) 1944-, to US financial fraud 1971- (US self-indulgent disconnection of the dollar value from gold after having spent too much on wars and space race etc.). US' "China threat" demonizing is now code for US own threat, i.e. US masking its own desperation when losing its 1971- stolen dollar hegemony because of China's growing high tech superiority. How many understand this simple truth - and how many blink it?! Before 1971 there was only one world-dollar (since Bretton Woods 1944). After the "Nixon chock" 1971 there were two: One for US dictated by US (Feds), and an other for the rest of the world, also dictated by US. And the difference was that the US-dollar made it possible for US to prosper despite trade deficit, because the rest of the world has paid the difference. Also do recognize that Roosewelt's similar move 1933 happened before the Bretton Woods agreement.
Why is a meritocratic, capitalism and trade supporting, Chinese president, with more than 2/3 approval rating, called a "dictator", while a wild capitalism and protectionism and anti-China sanctions and smearing supporting, militaristic warmongering US president with 1/3 of indirect votes on electors who were chosing among candidates chosen by the big money, is called "democratic"?! It seems that "Christian democracy" is a similarly empty but magic wording as is "the Atheist Communist dictatorship".
Forget about Nature! Here you get your by far most qualified and least biased (not steered by peer "reviews" or PC editors, but by super high IQ not corrupted by religion, politics or money) scientific overall understanding of evolution (1981), human evolution (1992-), consciousness (1992-94) and AI (1979-), and Human Rights (1979- incl. sex segregation). In his topics of scientific interest Peter Klevius has got highest possible recommendations from world leading professors on the topics. And no, the author has never been caught with mental problems, abuse or criminality, and has successfully fostered all of his children. So why presenting himself like this?! Simply because his best services to science can't get properly through via other media, and here it's often dismissed as "just a blogger's opinion" - which is quite rich when considering much peer reviewed nonsense PC "science" allowed on Nature! And non-scientific posts here of course utilize the same brain power.
Acknowledgement: Everything produced by Peter Klevius stands for those Universal Human Rights of 1948 which islam's main representative OIC rejected 1990!

Tuesday, May 13, 2025

Peter Klevius not only defends Union Jack* (despite its piracy birth) against continuous militaristic warmonger desecration, but also enlightens its dark past for the purpose of a possibly brighter future with less Sinophobia**.

"Jack" refers to a small flag flown on boats and ships. "Union" refers to when the king of Scotland included England under his rule.
 
** Because China has no reason to "pose a threat", but a R&D superiority that no other country or coalition can get even close to (a fact politicians and media either are ignorant about or deliberately hide), then the only reason to push for more "defense" spending is not only shortsighted but also detrimental for the people. After all, this waste of money excludes itself from using Chinese high tech, and therefore will always lie behind. And this doesn't really matter for Western arms companies because the idea for them is just selling as much as possible. This means that people in the West are forced to pay for underwhelming products that will probably never even be used and tested - but of course continue to pay off through endless provocative drills etc. And while US "defense" spending is all about keeping its stolen $-hegemony, China's defense spending is all about avoiding US military containment of it as US did against Japan. Only difference being that while Japan had become a militant fascist state after US "cannon boat diplomacy", China is quite the opposite.

For questionable reason UK politicians may declare a country "hostile" no matter how peaceful it is and how it tries to cooperate, while UK may declare the worst of aggressive militaristic rogue states "an important ally with longtime close bonds" no matter how badly it behaves. This corruption can be traced back to Queen Elizabeth 1 and her use of pirates against countries she didn't like.

This British use of pirates as mercenaries was the seed to UK's imperialism. And although UK prospered by sucking from around the world, they were kicked out of their US colony, which successfully copied the same piracy tactics against English ships. However, this evil piracy cancer continued in both countries.

Elizabeth I made England the pirate state US/UK still are while e.g. complicit to Israel's genocide against Palestinians. 

1564 Elizabeth I made England a "legal" pirate state by commissioning pirate and slave trader John Hawkins to continue his criminal deeds with her blessing and her ship Jesus of Lübeck added to the ships he already possessed.

Coat of arms granted pirate John Hawkins by Elizabeth I 1565 showing a black slave.

John Hawkins specialty was to attack slave ships, selling the slaves and keeping the ships, which deeply impressed Queen Elizabeth.

Early on England became a proto "sea dog empire" because it's an island that was occupied by the most talented of European seafarers, i.e. the Vikings from Russia/Fennoscandia.

Piracy is an act of violent robbery by ship or boat-borne attackers upon a coastal area. It has a long history from at least the sea people who caused the bronzeage collapse some 1200 BC, over the Goths some 2000 years ago and the Vikings 1275 years ago. And although Peter Klevius is genetically a typical Viking or Anglo-Saxon with a Swedish mother tongue - which originated in Gothic* and Old Nordic* - he only feels disgust about their cultural behavior. 

* English is a late Swedish creole language which shares most words (except the latin ones) but spells and prounances them differently. So for example, the originally Gothic words 'arm', 'hand', 'finger' are all spelled similarly in modern Swedish and English but pronounced differently.  

$-embezzler (since 1971) US is the real power behind Israel's genocide against Palestinians - executed by a criminal anti-democratic dictator.

US/UK brothers in arms from firebombing civilians 1945, to Yemen 2025.

From Churchill's "operation unthinkable" plan to attack Russians after their WW2 victory, to Starmer's impossible* 2025 plan of the "coalition of the willing" to keep the proxy war against Russia keep going even after a possible peace deal.

However, the only solution is correcting the wrongs US/NATO caused in the first place. How hypocritical isn't it to demand a 30 days ceasefire and no change at all to the underlying reality?! A propaganda tool to point to Russia being "unwilling" to peace. A Russia that had done everything to make a prosperous and peaceful coexistence with EU possible via trade.
 

500 years of England's (and later US) continuing state sponsored "sea dog" piracy is now doomed to end because of China's* technological superiority. However, sadly UK PM Starmer hasn't got this picture fully focused as yet.

* China's R&D superiority grants its peaceful policy - it was US military that supported the mass murderer and dictator Chiang Kai-shek to isolate Taiwan from mainland China at a time when China was weakened after the Japanese invasion. However, $-embezzler (since 1971) US is now in a desperate situation because of its reliance on feeding on the stolen world dollar which inevitably will collapse because of China's accelerating success. And US brexit puppet UK is following its criminal master rather than choosing prosperity and peace with China. Moreover, Russia has made every effort possible to create a peaceful cooperation with the West. Putin even proposed that Russia should join NATO but was of course rejected. Then Putin arranged for peaceful cooperation between EU and Russia by selling cheap and clean natural gas while importing other stuff from EU. But US said no and later even arranged to destroy the extremely expensive and important peace link called Nord Stream between Russia and Germany. And every accusation against Russia's "behavior" could easily be outperformed by even worse but neglected behavior by US.














The evil heritagefrom WW2

Western politicians blinked the appalling neo-Nazis involving civil war and genocide against Russians in Ukraine, while after the heavily provoked Russian 2022 military operation that was made to end the genocide and force Ukraine to negotiations, completely erased the important background while only ranting in terms of "Putin, the aggressor, who made an unprovoked full scale invasion of an innocent country" (many of these voices also supported US Iraq invasion). No wonder Russia turned to China which already is flying several types of 6th generation aircraft. And Nvidia's CEO Jensen Huang said China is “not behind” the U.S. in AI and praised Huawei as a top global tech company. “China, with half of the world’s AI researchers, has highly capable AI experts at every layer of the AI stack. US cannot manipulate regulators to capture victory in AI,” a spokesperson said. “They’re incredible in computing and network technology, all these essential capabilities to advance AI,” Huang said. “They have made enormous progress in the last several years.” In fact, China is already far ahead in real world comparison.

From 'operation unthinkable' to 'coalition of the willing'

The real threat and worst nightmare for UK arms hawks is that Putin again starts peaceful trading with cheap gas etc. with EU. 

UK Defense Secretary John Healey on BBC (and of course no one questioning his unfounded ranting): Putin caused high gas price.

Peter Klevius: No, quite the opposite. Putin offered cheap gas via Nord Stream but Biden stopped it, and instead sells expensive LNG to EU which has heavilu affected both gas and electricity price in UK because of how it's tied to the gas price in EU.

UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy: Putin is an aggressor who must be kept responsible for his crimes.

Peter Klevius: So what about Netanyahu? Abd why not also make US/NATO leadership responsible as the aggressors who urged for NATO nuke expansion in a Ukraine that was promised to be free from nukes! After all, Onama started it in 2013, and in 2014 he toppled Ukraine's elected president and initiated a civil war and knowingly enabled a neo-Nazi genocide against Russians in Ukraine.

The questionable "will" and "willingness" of many UK politicians reveals that it's the West, not the East, that is the main threat to peace and prosperity. And why is UK so eager to arrest Iranian Shia muslims who don't pose a threat to civilians, but not Saudi sponsored Sunni islamists who do pose a constant threat to ordinary people in UK?

 

 Russians raised the victory flag over the Reichstag in Berlin May 2, 1945, while US/UK later in the night were still bombing Kiel with napalm.

 

 In the night of May 2 (and morning May 3) 1945 when Russian soldiers in the daytime had already raised the victory flag over the Reichstag in Berlin, UK continued to bomb a defenseless Kiel with napalm, firebombs etc.

After having firebombed defenseless civilians with some thousand bomb-planes together with US at the very end of the war, Churchill's plan 'Operation Unthinkable' was to attack the Russian liberators.

How evil was it to plan to jump on Russians after they had made the by far biggest victory contribution and sacrificed nearly 30 Million Russians against European fascism?! UK lost 0.4 Million which should also be compared with the enormous amount of firebombed civilian deaths in attacks that had little or nothing to contribute, but was the result of Germanphobic hate spread mainly via BBC's propaganda deliberately and murdering innocent German civilians.

Churchill's plan 'Operation Unthinkable' (May 1945 after the Russians had taken Berlin and Germany had capitulated) included a surprise attack on the victorious Russian soldiers in Germany to impose "the will of the United States and British Empire upon Russia"*. The "unthinkable" plan assumed a surprise attack on Russian soldiers stationed in Germany to impose "the will of UK and US upon Russia". "The will" was qualified as "a square deal for Poland", but added that "that does not necessarily limit the military commitment". The assessment, signed by the Chief of Army Staff on 9 June 1945, concluded: "It would be beyond our power to win a quick but limited success and we would be committed to a protracted war against heavy odds". The code name was now reused instead for a second plan, which was a defensive scenario by which UK was to defend against a Russian drive towards the North Sea and the Atlantic Ocean after the withdrawal of the US forces from the Continent. When the Labour Party acquired power by the 1945 general election, it ignored the draft plan. However, today Labour seems to have revitalized it again.

* Compare this to leading UK voices during the UK initiated Opium war who wanted 'to show the Chinese British civilization'.

While a majority is against increased "defense" spending, BBC does its utmost to change their mind.


BBC's lying and ignorant warmongering fake info presenters Sarah Montague and Evan Davis constitute just the tip of BBC Goebbelian iceberg.


US authoritarian Maoism






Empty "democracy"*

 * With 1/3 of votes Labour got 2/3 of the parliament - which makes a vote of censure impossible for at least five years - while delivering the opposite to voters expectation. 

 Some ideologists, such as Kingoro Hashimoto, proposed a single-party dictatorship, based on populism, patterned after the European fascist movements. An Investigation of Global Policy with the Yamato Race as Nucleus shows the influence clearly.[13]

These geopolitical ideals developed into the Amau Doctrine (天羽声明, an Asian Monroe Doctrine), stating that Japan assumed total responsibility for peace in Asia, and can be seen later when Prime Minister Kōki Hirota proclaimed justified Japanese expansion into northern China as the creation of "a special zone, anti-communist, pro-Japanese and pro-Manchukuo" that was a "fundamental part" of Japanese national existence.

Poor Brits are forced to pay more for annoying army copters and jets noisy "training" over their heads for wars abroad while getting less welfare and security at home

UK's authoritarian* anti-democratic* dictatorship imposes* warfare state that increases* threats against UK while the welfare state suffers.

* Increases risk of more Saudi sponsored Sunni islamist attacks because of UK's support of Israel's genocide against Palestinians - and possible escalation of the war against Russia to a point where UK itself risks being targeted.

Against the will of the people Starmer chose to spend on risky militaristic meddling in other countries, so to please the world's worst rogue* state US while cutting on welfare.


Read how Peter Klevius solved "the biggest mystery in science".

A recorded public time-line of Peter Klevius original research on evolution, consciousness, existencecentrism, anthropology and sociology 1979-2012 - and some thoughts about self-citation  

Read Peter Klevius in-depth research on The Psychosocial Freud Timeline.

Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024. 

Read how climate change made human evolution possible in SE Asian volatile archipelago - not on a continent like Africa

 Read how two craniopagus twins born 2006 solved the "greatest mystery in science" - and proved Peter Klevius theory from 1992-94 100% correct.  

 Read Peter Klevius thesis Pathological Symbiosis in LVU on how a hoax child-psychoanalytic concept is still used by the Swedish social state to abduct children on subjective grounds.  It also reveals (see email correspondens in appendix) how legislators were lured to pass a Human Rights violating law which was then blinked by ECHR because it was seen as below the "margin of appreciation". 
 
Peter Klevius started as an empty origo/singularity whose existencecentrism (mind) now is the sum of his experience with his surroundings and due synaptic adaptations, while also constituting part of the surroundings of others. A canvas which doesn't have a soul/self of its own but does reflect what it has experienced and adapted to. However, the false impression of having a "self", "free will" etc. rests on language, i.e. the use of the word 'I' which animals and humans without language lack. As a human with language you are in the same position as Peter Klevius, and together we all (incl. non-language humans) make up the total existencecentrism of humankind - and the key to a universal human with (negative) Human Rights without irrational exceptions and impositions. So when Peter Klevius talks/writes/acts, he does so against a background that includes the latest synapses combinations in his brain as well as what his other nerve signals bring to his thalamus from his body and other surroundings. 

Peter Klevius (1981, 1992): The ultimate question ought to be: What is it like to be a stone? There's no difference between human consciousness polished through living, and the "consciousness" of a stone that has been smoothly shaped in streaming water against other rocks, stones etc. It started its "life" as a rugged piece of rock in a mountain and adapted to its life in streaming water down hill, or perhaps as a piece of rock falling on a beach and polished by waves. 


 

How US robs the world

How US robs the world














Monday, January 20, 2025

Peter Klevius 'existencecentrism' explains why you can believe in ghosts but not in God - and not even think about a God other than the one imprisoned in your head.

Read how Peter Klevius solved "the biggest mystery in science".

A recorded public time-line of Peter Klevius original research on evolution, consciousness, existencecentrism, anthropology and sociology 1979-2012 - and some thoughts about self-citation  

Read Peter Klevius in-depth research on The Psychosocial Freud Timeline.

Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024. 

Read how climate change made human evolution possible in SE Asian volatile archipelago - not on a continent like Africa

 Read how two craniopagus twins born 2006 solved the "greatest mystery in science" - and proved Peter Klevius theory from 1992-94 100% correct.  

 Read Peter Klevius thesis Pathological Symbiosis in LVU on how a hoax child-psychoanalytic concept is still used by the Swedish social state to abduct children on subjective grounds.  It also reveals (see email correspondens in appendix) how legislators were lured to pass a Human Rights violating law which was then blinked by ECHR because it was seen as below the "margin of appreciation".

Peter Klevius started as an empty origo/singularity whose existencecentrism (mind) now is the sum of his experience with his surroundings and due synaptic adaptations, while also constituting part of the surroundings of others. A canvas which doesn't have a soul/self of its own but does reflect what it has experienced and adapted to. However, the false impression of having a "self", "free will" etc. rests on language, i.e. the use of the word 'I' which animals and humans without language lack. As a human with language you are in the same position as Peter Klevius, and together we all (incl. non-language humans) make up the total existencecentrism of humankind - and the key to a universal human with (negative) Human Rights without irrational exceptions and impositions. So when Peter Klevius talks/writes/acts, he does so against a background that includes the latest synapses combinations in his brain as well as what his other nerve signals bring to his thalamus from his body and other surroundings.

Peter Klevius (1981, 1992): The ultimate question ought to be: What is it like to be a stone? There's no difference between human consciousness polished through living, and the "consciousness" of a stone that has been smoothly shaped in streaming water against other rocks, stones etc. It started its "life" as a rugged piece of rock in a mountain and adapted to its life in streaming water down hill, or perhaps as a piece of rock falling on a beach and polished by waves. 


Atheism*, not racist/sexist and militant "monotheisms" (look at Syria, Israel, Palestine etc.), is the only road to human virtue and the full acceptance of basic (negative) individual and Universal Human Rights without "monotheist"** religions defining exceptions.

* The only relevant definition of Atheism ought to rest on its European 16th Century meaning as the opposite the "monotheistic" God. Atheism cleans you from religious prejudice and delivers a rock solid platform for how to be a decent human. Atheism is the only route to fully respect Human Rights, i.e. not believing in an impossible monotheistic God "above and beyond anything that exists in the world", which is, in fact, your own personal wishful twisting of language. Language is human made "building blocks" and can construe whatever meaningless nonsense. This distinguishes an irrational ("outside" language) belief in God from a rational (inside language) belief in God or other deities, ghosts etc. Pretending to talk "outside" one's existencecentrism is self delusion.

** The peculiar concept "monotheism" is an oxymoron because its truly "God-part" is declared inaccessible for the human mind and cannot therefore be shared among humans. This leaves every believer with his own belief construction lacking any "essence" of "God's" most important characteristics.


Existencecentrism is the observable and thinkable world, and nothing can therefore exist "outside" it - incl. any question or belief. 

1000 yrs before Peter Klevius introduced 'existencecentrism' (1981 and 1992) proving belief in the God cult is impossible (because it bounces against the walls of mind), Gaunilo of Marmoutiers similarly said that as God cannot be conceived, then Anselm is wrong. However, 'existencecentrism' also excludes the very notion of something "beyond" mind. The fallacy here is language which can produce irrationality that an animal or feral human would never be able to.


Atheist Peter Klevius explains why the belief in a "God"* is impossible - and why "monotheisms" are against Human Rights. And he has all of human history on his side**.

* Defined as "outside" human reach. Whereas the Jew (Moses) could talk to God but not see his face, the early Christians could only see God's humanized son, and Muhammad (a further development of Arianism) who  got no direct or indirect contact with God but had to settle with an angel. In polytheistic belief systems, a god is "a spirit or being believed to have been created out of something already existing in the world.

** Peter Klevius lives in a time when the world has got enough of "monotheistic" evil - and when the much older, self-evident and sophisticated Atheism is surpassing in R&D, meritocracy, fairness etc., first shown by post-war Japan and now China.

Ghosts can be derived from faith - "God" cannot. Faith is limited by our existencecentrism (mind, if you prefer) which excludes a "creator"* as a principal object of faith. Whatever you have faith in is within your existencecentrism - meaning Peter Klevius can only write about the border of existencecentrism, but is excluded from meaningfully writing the sentence 'outside the border'.

* A "creator" is already created and as such locked into the human mind - and nowhere else. Communicating one's "creator" to an other person inevitably adapts and changes this "creator" in accordance with this other mind. Because of existencecentrism, a "God" cannot be omnipresent. In other words, a "God" cannot be part time present in the human mind. What is present is all there is of "God". Same applies to the hence meaningless sentence 'but there could be something beyond human comprehension'. The term "supernatural" emerged in the Middle Ages and did not exist in the ancient world.


1981 Peter Klevius outlined in an article (Resursbegär) the meaning of what he later (1992) titled 'existencecentrism' in his book Resursbegär ('Demand for Resources' in the Swedish/Nordic creole* language now called English). G. H. von Wright (Wittgenstein's self-appointed successor at Cambridge) strongly approved of both versions.


* Resursbegär in direct translation would be something like 'resource beggar'.

The first paragraph in the original 1981 article in a poor translation from Swedish with some added comments in brackets:

The basic element of existence is change where the causality of events constitutes a complex of evolution and devolution (a popular division of the more appropriet 'adaptation'). Evolution can (therefore) be said to be the consequence of the variables of causality in time where the complexity (from an evolutionary point of view - i.e. not necessarily absolute complexity) of older structures is reinforced. This development stays in an apparent opposition to the thermodynamics of universe which theoretically could leads to what is called "maximum entropy", i.e. equal distribution of energy, where time itself stops. Thus, one could fatalistically say that evolution in fact only constitutes components of causality on its way to uniformity, where the end point of evolution is determined by its external frame of reference i.e. (the observable) universe, and can be summed up in the words of the philosopher Hegel: 'Pure being and nothingness are identical'. A consolation for the intellect, however, is that the more facts science (nature) presents, the greater appears to us the underlying structure of existence that we cannot reach. Being able to live with and accept this uncertainty (existencecentrism and due uncertainty* as the real "meaning of life") is not only a must but also a privilege. Desperately lapsing into dogmatism or hasty conclusions due to inability to live with unsolved problems is highly unscientific.

* You can only be uncertain within your existencecentrism. Moreover, this uncertainty cannot even speculate beyond one's existencecentrism, only within its ever changing complexity. And even though everything constantly changes, the limit of existencecentrism does not because there's no reference "outside" it.  

All creation myths - except "monotheist" - start from something already existing "inside" the world.

It's shameful and appalling of the $-thief US led West to imply that "belief" in a fancy but destructive mythology about an impossible "monotheist" God somehow would be more "sophistocated" than the sound views of billions of Atheists who understand that a "god" "outside" the human realm is impossible. In its latest modern appearance it all started with US colonial imperiaism followed by US "Red Scare" anti-Communist propaganda, which is now targeted on China. Atheism is by supremacist theocracy presented at best as something not reaching the level of "monotheisms", and at worst as plain evil, when in fact the very opposite is more than true, i.e. considering the impossibility of "monotheist belief".

Wikipedia: Proponents of "Abrahamic" faiths believe that God is beyond the grasp of the human mind and transcendent, meaning that he (sic) is outside space and outside time and therefore not subject to anything within his creation.

Peter Klevius: So how could you possibly have "faith" in the part of God that's beyond you? Leaving you - as Peter Klevius has stated since his early teens - with only your "personal God", i.e. a castrated one in your imagination.

Peter Klevius has been surrounded day and night by people throughout his (Atheist) life, yet no one (incl. himself) has ever seen him unhappy (having faced problems yes, and solved them, but never trapped in "idling" unhappiness). 


Excerpt from Demand for Resources (P. Klevius 1992:21-22, Resursbegär, ISBN 9173288411). A follow up to the original (see below) article from 1981 which first described what later became titled 'existencecentrism', and which 1980 was hailed by G.H. von Wright (Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge) and again a decade later 1991 when he read the final manuscript of the book - including this chapter on existencecentrism.


Chapt. Existencecentrism (Resursbegär 1992).

The civilized human retraces her/his steps, lights a light and allows her/himself to be enlightened - only the suffering in the past and the shadow over the future are greater.

The word 'to exist', from Latin existere - to emerge, to appear - has, like the word existence, nowadays as the main meaning pre-existing, i.e. something that has arisen/been created and now exists in the world of our senses.

To exist, i.e. existence, constitutes our vantage point when we consider our surroundings in time and space. We are existencecentered. Existence prevents godlike all-mightiness but also easily leads to self-glorifying considerations. The word anthropocentrism covers some, but not all, of the meaning of existencecentrism.

Existence stands in contrast or as a complement to the modern Protestant concept of God. Existence and God, or as I prefer to express it, human and the unconscious or unreachable (the "outer" limit of existencecentrism) together form 'everything' - God/the unreachable is thus not seen in entities but in the existence of thoughts via awareness of our existencecentrism (hence excluding even any thought about a God "residing outside" our existencecentrism - only within it, which of course eliminates God's most important definition other than as play with language).

That the human thought is locked to its subject, i.e. that someone thinks the thought, is connected to our linear cumulative conception of history. The narrative/thought creation turns into a giant inverted pyramid where stone is added to stone while the tip proportionally gets narrower as it points downward/backward and we ourselves stand on the top/latest and widest part (called 'now' in Peter Klevius 1992-94 EMAH theory that later became empirically proven through the 2006 birth of a unique set of craniopagus twins with separate cortices but connected thalanuses which made them able to 'talk inside their head' while keeping separate personalities in their cortices).

The engine of the cumulative conception of history, i.e. what determines the value of past and present-day social phenomena, exists only in the present. The perception of history as linearly cumulative has as a consequence the need for creation. Development requires a beginning. The creation stories can be divided into two main groups: Creation from something or from nothing. In more "primitive" cultural contexts, it is common to imagine some form of primeval being that is brought to life during creation, while within the monotheism influenced cultural circle, creation out of nothing with the help of God (the "first mover") is advocated. This can sometimes take surprising expressions such as e.g. in the s.c. "Big Bang" theory.

The driving forces behind science and religion are close to each other and the idea of ​​an eternal universe where creation only exists in the human mind is difficult to accept (P. Klevius 1992:22).


Peter Klevius additional comment:

Existencecentrism, together with the stone example in the same 1992 book, laid the ground work for EMAH, which 1994 added the new findings re. cortico-thalamic two-way connections reported in Nature 1993. Although Peter Klevius had always been convinced it all happened in the thalamus, he out of intellectual cowardice didn't dare to write it down in the 1992 book - which, btw was strongly supported 1991 by G. H. von Wright (Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge) who 1980 also approved of the first outlining of existencecentrism in the 1981 published article Resursbegär.


Most people are Atheists, yet some are still haunted by the negativism $-embezzler (since 1971) US injected in it in its Red Scare campaign, McCarthyism etc.

Statistically Atheists in England have now surpassed anti-Atheists. However, do realize that most people who pose as religious, do not in fact believe in an irrational (i,e, outside language) God, i.e. they should therefore also be classified as Atheists - although unwittingly still supporting irrational orthodoxy because still sharing the same title of their beliefs. Moreover, there's also a tendency that people who normally don't bother much of their kins or "community", utilize historical religious traditions to make up for this lack.   

The "monotheistic" God first appeared as picking Jew's as his "chosen people", then was split in three by Christianity, and finally got rid of completely in islam, which replaced Allah with a medieval human warlord whose deeds are still accepted as norm by islamists while the rest of muslims have to constantly update their "interpretation" of islam while facing Muhammed.


Why $-freeloader (since 1971) US forced its "allies" to ban information about Confucianism

The appalling supremacist and presumptuous US led Western delusion about supernatural* "monotheism" being somehow better than Atheist (i.e. not-monotheist) cultures and societies like e.g. China, Japan etc., is West's downfall trap.

You are - just like a stone in a river or the observable universe - the ever changing product of your adaptations to your ever changing surroundings. You were born with many more synapse connections than you have now as the result of your adaptation to your surroundings which has removed excessive ones (although new connections are also made albeit to a lesser extent) so to match and synchronize (update) to your life situation.    

Everything we can think and talk about is within our mind (existencecentrism) - and nowhere else.

In language made up "forces beyond scientific understanding or the laws of nature"* have no meaning outside language. Likewise, there is no "mystical" math connection to a "real world". Mathematical objects are all operational entities applied to where they fit, so to say. A number or a traffic sign are operational, and should not be confused with their medium, i.e. for example when crashing into a traffic sign with a number.

* Law is a set of rules that are created and are enforceable by social or governmental institutions to regulate behavior, with its precise definition a matter of longstanding debate.

Quite the opposite to Aquinas, Peter Klevius points out that because of language, only humans can be irrational. A stone or an insect etc. are always rational, i.e. rationally* adapting to their surroundings. It's only in language we can be irrational. A human without language can not be irrational.

* Rational here of course means from the perspective of the insect - not from a human.

Words like nothing, nonexistence, and non-being, are ontologically meaningless. Questions like 'why is there something instead of nothing' lack definition of the proposed but impossible to define 'nothing' "alternative".  

The ghost or "God" are always knowable because they exist within human existencecentrism. However, they can never be unknowable because that would imply "outside" human existencecentrism which is logically impossible.

"Monotheism" timeline

The Chinese heaven at least 2050 BC was the origin myth under which the emperor ruled, and was securely anchored within human existencecentrism, i.e. the primordial state as explained by Peter Klevius (1992) as being - with many variants - the global creation myth in every society except for the late introduction of the "monotheistic" ones. However, it was during its path via Zoroastrianism 1700 BC to Sogdia in the 6th Century BC where it culturally mixed with Indus valley, and changed character when it reached Judaism and became the racist God's "chosen people" dogma.

The sum of all adaptation/experience by an individual cannot incl. non-experience.

Since Kierkegaard, most Christians are Agnostics - but without always admitting it. Peter Klevius advise encourages them to become fully Atheists so to be able to reconcile themselves with basic (negative) Universal Human Rights of the individual, not the religious "community". After all, we are individuals, not "communities.

Existence cannot be "meaningless" because the concept of "meaningless" is part of existence inside existencecentrism. In fact, as Peter Klevius wrote 1981 (in Resursbegär), an all-mighty "god" would drown in its logical boredom, whereas for humans the very uncertainty in an eternally changing world is what gives meaning to life - to a point where even a person doomed to die prematurely, clings to hope. 

There is no universally accepted consensus on what a deity is.

"God" comes from the Proto-Germanic Gaut, which traces it to the PIE root *ghu-to- ("poured"), derived from the root *gheu- ("to pour, pour a libation"). The term *gheu- is also the source of the Greek khein "to pour". Originally the word "god" and its other Germanic cognates were neuter nouns but shifted to being generally masculine under the influence of Christianity in which the god is typically seen as male. In contrast, all ancient Indo-European cultures and mythologies recognized both masculine and feminine deities.

Native Brits from Doggerland spoke a proto-Finnish/Uralic (Eurasiatic) language 

The legitimacy of Western philosophy was thoroughly crashed by a Western "philosopher" named Ludvig Wittgenstein (the mentor of Peter Klevius mentor G.H. von Wright). Although the catholic Anscombe was a good friend with him, she didn't fully understand Wittgensteiun's curiosity about religion, psychoanalysis etc.

Swedish "alternative media" Swebbtv is sadly a prejudicial and theocratic laughing stock under a dumb and prejudicial dictator. And this is today Sweden which used to be a model for the world!

Swebbtv's owner and opinion dictator Mikael Willgert is an extreme Sinophobe, but eagerly supports Israel's genocide against Palestinians.  And when "islamophobe" Peter Klevius criticized Willgert's use of the 1988 Hamas charter instead of the updated 2017 charter,  he was immediately deleted. Yes, like all monotheistic cults islam also faces a painful struggle against its past, just like orthodox Judaism and Zionism. Atheism is the only clean road to basic (negative) Universal Human Rights. It's truly sad that Atheist Sweden came to change path because of islam and US Christian-Judaic theocracy (see e.g. the Barcelona treaty).

He also boosts extreme conspiracy theories such as e,g, that Sweden's PM Olof Palme wasn't murdered and that it was just a "theater murder". He also boosts the crazy idea that US government triggered nukes under the Twin Towers etc. And if someone comments criticism against what Mikael Willgert opinions then they are deleted. Mikael Willgert also seems to boost a misogynist agenda spiced with long outdated views on what women should and shouldn't do as well as women's inferior capacities as leaders etc. The only decent voice on Swebbtv is Lars Bern who seems to understand the problem with US and the possibilities with China.

Tuesday, June 13, 2023

Peter Klevius wonders why Sweden chose the new made up personal pronoun 'hen' instead of the Finnish 'hän' which has been in use since long before Sweden or Old Nordic even existed?!

  

After 20+ years blogging with highly intelligent Human Rights based content and groundbreaking scientific revelations, with thousands of postings and images, Google still has monumental problem finding Peter Klevius - while Gimp, Duckduckgo etc. easily find him.

Acknowledgement: Peter Klevius unique access to a bias free scientific realm (a blessing and a curse) is a combination of a high IQ brain*, lack of economic ties**, lack of religious or "spiritual" bias, and a life history starting with being kidnapped to an other country at age two and then at age 17 kicked back penniless to his country of birth, where he had to work instead of university. Add a deep interest in science ignited at age 13 by mathematician Clas-Olof Selenius (dad of Peter.s childhood friend Carl-Olof). This has made Peter Klevius an intellectual coward only picking low hanging fruits that are "forbidden" due to academic PC bias - and therefore often mistakenly seen as a bragger but actually making him the most cautious/humble scientist avoiding loose speculations, such as e.g. what is often happily published in Nature etc. fueled by biased peer reviews (see e.g. the chapter Science and References in Peter Klevius 1992 book Demand for Resources).

* Father (whom he never met) won Gothenburg chess championship many times over four decades, and sister won IBM's talent test with IQ 167. Finnish neuroscientist, professor J. Juurmaa: 'Peter Kleviuksen ajatuksen kulku on ilmavan lennokas ja samalla iskevän ytimekäs' ('Peter Klevius' flow of thought is airily wide-ranging and at the same time punchily concise').

** Only his 1981 article Resursbegär (Demand for Resources) was paid for (Fmk 500) mainly because Georg Henrik von Wright (Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge) liked it and convinced the editor in chief (Jan-Magnus Jansson) to publish it.
 

Read how Peter Klevius solved "the biggest mystery in science".

A recorded public time-line of Peter Klevius original research on evolution, consciousness, existencecentrism, anthropology and sociology 1979-2012 - and some thoughts about self-citation  

Read Peter Klevius in-depth research on The Psychosocial Freud Timeline.

Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024. 

Read how climate change made human evolution possible in SE Asian volatile archipelago - not on a continent like Africa

 Read how two craniopagus twins born 2006 solved the "greatest mystery in science" - and proved Peter Klevius theory from 1992-94 100% correct.  

 Read Peter Klevius thesis Pathological Symbiosis in LVU on how a hoax child-psychoanalytic concept is still used by the Swedish social state to abduct children on subjective grounds.  It also reveals (see email correspondens in appendix) how legislators were lured to pass a Human Rights violating law which was then blinked by ECHR because it was seen as below the "margin of appreciation". 
 
Peter Klevius started as an empty origo/singularity whose existencecentrism (mind) now is the sum of his experience with his surroundings and due synaptic adaptations, while also constituting part of the surroundings of others. A canvas which doesn't have a soul/self of its own but does reflect what it has experienced and adapted to. However, the false impression of having a "self", "free will" etc. rests on language, i.e. the use of the word 'I' which animals and humans without language lack. As a human with language you are in the same position as Peter Klevius, and together we all (incl. non-language humans) make up the total existencecentrism of humankind - and the key to a universal human with (negative) Human Rights without irrational exceptions and impositions. So when Peter Klevius talks/writes/acts, he does so against a background that includes the latest synapses combinations in his brain as well as what his other nerve signals bring to his thalamus from his body and other surroundings. 

Peter Klevius (1981, 1992): The ultimate question ought to be: What is it like to be a stone? There's no difference between human consciousness polished through living, and the "consciousness" of a stone that has been smoothly shaped in streaming water against other rocks, stones etc. It started its "life" as a rugged piece of rock in a mountain and adapted to its life in streaming water down hill, or perhaps as a piece of rock falling on a beach and polished by waves. 


 

How US robs the world

How US robs the world

 

See how US stole the world-dollar 1971 - and how China's rise challenges US stolen dollar hegemony.

The US demonized China has nothing to do with the real China, but all to do with US dollar embezzlement that makes it possible for US to spend despite constant trade deficit. US is the world's biggest counterfeiter - and a dangerous loser!


To understand US fear of China (the "China threat"), you need to understand 1) the background, i.e. US enormous 1971 dollar theft and its escalating consequences now, 2)  the fact that China is already superior in every area* of tech and science, as well as meritocratic real democracy.  Moreover, China has no reason to start wars - while US whole existence (the stolen dollar hegemony) depends on warmongering (militarization), and starting and continuing wars. And to understand how low the US led West has sunk, just consider BBC implying Russia deliberately targeting a children's hospital (why would Russia ask for more negative news?!) while not mentioning with a word Israel's slaughtering in Gaza and West bank the same day - not to mention the more than 40,000 Palestinians already murdered - most of them children and innocent adults!

* Both US and China itself try to downplay China's success - for different reasons.

 Watch how US stole the dollar. When Nixon 1971 admitted US dollar theft (while lying it was temporary) said 'your dollar may not give you as much abroad as before", that statement actually defined the amount of US embezzlement, because when the US dollar was no longer pegged to gold - only pegged to the whims of US Federal Reserve - it meant that the world dollar (outside US) had to pay for US deficit. So the Bretton Woods (1944) all world currency dollar that was pegged to gold under the custodianship of the Fed, after the theft 1971 (i.e. US violation of the gold connection) the dollar became split in two: a US dollar covering US deficit, and a world dollar that pays for it - both under the custodianship of US. What the US Fed is doing is controlling both currencies while favoring the US dollar.
 

 US is the real enemy - and modern meritocratic high tech China is the real friend for any country that chooses peace and prosperity instead of militarism, war and misery!

 
 

 

 Only Indoeuropean and semitic languages started the ridiculous sexsegregation in personal pronouns. Most other and older languages didn't need this linguistic sex apartheid!

Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024.

Read how climate change made human evolution possible in SE Asian volatile archipelago - not on a continent like Africa

Read how two craniopagus twins born 2006 solved the "greatest mystery in science" - and proved Peter Klevius theory from 1992-94 100% correct.

* Do yourself a favor and read  US lies about 1989 Tianamen riots - and the horrifying truth! You'll have a hard time find this combined info anywhere else on the US spied and censored web. And Google uses all its power to suppress it.
 

A modern male Homo sapiens*. This particular individual belongs to the bastard race that was the result when mongoloids mixed with archaic Homos.


 * Peter Klevius contemplating human evolution, consciousness and sex segregation. His father was a Goth from Gothenburg (possibly Sweden's best chess player of his time considering he won the Gothenburg championship many times over more than four decades) and his mother was from Finland and possessed 1/3 mongoloid features (she was extremely intelligent - just like her two brothers who both had studied double exams in engineering and economy and were leaders in Finland's biggest companies). Klevius himself may in this context be seen as a generational step downwards, i..e. in line with an overall progression towards a more diluted absolute intelligence. Klevius half sister (same mother but different father) followed the same trend and scored only 167 on an IBM IQ talent test. Photo taken some years after Peter Klevius in 1979 wrote the original Demand for Resources and created the 'Woman' drawing seen below.

 

 Peter Klevius wrote:

Thursday, December 6, 2018

On Finland's National Day Klevius suggests some thoughts to the forgotten "Finland-Swedes"

Kurgan love/rape affairs with Sami girls created bilingual "Finland-Swedes - and the answer to a genetic puzzle.


 To understand why some people feel it's a"puzzle" see e.g.

On the trail of the Proto-Uralic speakers

The Levänluhta burials in Finland may be connected to the Late Antique Little Ice Age which was a long-lasting Northern Hemisphere cooling period in the 6th and 7th century AD, during the period known as late antiquity. The evidence comes from a temperature reconstruction from the Euro-Med2k working group of the international PAGES (Past Global Changes) project, using new tree-ring measurements from the Altai Mountains, which closely matches the temperatures in the Alps in the last two centuries.

Its existence was proposed as a theory in 2015, and subsequently confirmed as the interval from 536 to about 660 AD. This period followed three immense volcanic eruptions in 536, 540 and 547. One of the suspected volcanic sites for those events is the Rabaul caldera, in the western Pacific, which erupted around 540. The extreme weather events of 535–536 were the early phenomena of the century-long global temperature decline.

The evidence comes from a temperature reconstruction from the Euro-Med2k working group of the international PAGES (Past Global Changes) project, using new tree-ring measurements from the Altai Mountains, which closely matches the temperatures in the Alps in the last two centuries.

The 536 event seems to have led to the deposition of hoards of gold by Scandinavian elites at the end of the Migration Period.

Large volcanic eruptions affect global temperature almost instantly. Combined with a solar minimum (as we're going into right now) and due ocean and sea-ice responses, this might trigger a sun reflecting snow/ice cover that is the very hallmark of an iceage introduction.

Btw, today Finland-Swedes are continuously targeted by racist Finns - much more so than e.g. muslims.

Klevius wrote:

Tuesday, December 06, 2016


Congratulations Finland, the oldest 'land' on Earth turning 99 today as a nation.


As Klevius has pointed out for decades, in Finnish (as in most other non-IE and non-semitic languages) there is no sex segregation. A person is 'hän' regardless of sex, not the stupid he/she apartheid Europe has inherited from sexist Mideastern "monotheisms".

Is this why Finland became the most progressive country in Europe more than a century ago? And do note that full (i.e. also electable etc) voting rights for women in Finland was the result of non-socialists. Partly social-democratic Sweden had to wait 15 more years to achieve the same.


      
The bilingual Minna Canth street sign in Helsinki reflects not only 600 years as part of Sweden but, according to Klevius, perhaps even more so the time before, namely as Kvenland (Queenland) the home of the Goths and the Vikings.

Minna Canth, born Ulrika Wilhelmina Johnsson, 19 March 1844, Tampere/Finland - 12 May 1897, Kuopio/Finland) was a Finnish-Swedish writer (i.e. mother tongue Swedish*) and social activist who wrote her most important works against religion and the treatment of women in Finnish. She inspired the proposal 1997 in the Finnish Parliament (actually same year as she died).

 * in Finland both Swedish and Finnish are official languages since long ago (also see Kvenland/Kvinnoland/Queenland



Drawing (1979) by Peter Klevius. For those Humanrightsphobes with really limited understanding or blinded with prejudice, do note that the DNA "ladder" has steel rivets (i.e. strong both for trapping as well as for escaping), and that the female curvature shadows transgress from below over painful flames into a crown of liberty.

Perpetua (203 AD): 'I saw a ladder of tremendous height made of bronze, reaching all the way to the heavens, but it was so narrow that only one person could climb up at a time. To the sides of the ladder were attached all sorts of metal weapons: there were swords, spears, hooks, daggers, and spikes; so that if anyone tried to climb up carelessly or without paying attention, he would be mangled and his flesh would adhere to the weapons.' Perpetua realized she would have to do battle not merely with wild beasts, but with the Devil himself. Perpetua writes: They stripped me, and I became a man'.

Peter Klevius: They stripped Perpetua of her femininity and she became a human!

The whole LGBTQ+ carousel is completely insane when considering that the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) art. 2 gives everyone, no matter of sex, the right to live as they want without having to "change their sex". So the only reason for the madness is the stupidly stubborn cultural sex segregation which, like religious dictatorship, stipulates what behavior and appearance are "right" for a biological sex. And in the West, it is very much about licking islam, which refuses to conform to the basic (negative) rights in the UDHR, and instead created its own sharia declaration (CDHRI) in 1990 ("reformed" 2020 with blurring wording - but with the same basic Human Rights violating sharia issues still remaining). The UDHR allows women to voluntarily live according to sharia but sharia does not allow muslim women to live freely according to the UDHR. And culturally ending sex segregation does not mean that biological sex needs to be "changed." Learn more under 'Peter Klevius sex tutorials' which should be compulsory sex education for everyone - incl. people with ambiguous biological sex! The LGBTQ+ movement is a desperate effort to uphold outdated sex segregation. And while some old-fashioned trans people use it for this purpose, many youngsters (especially girls) follow it because they feel trapped in limiting sex segregation.


Finland-Swedes from Kvenland to Kaukalanda*

* 'Kauka-' is an old Finnish word stem meaning 'far away' and 'land' comes from Old Nordic/Gothic. To understand this connection continue reading.



Finland started as Finnland but later became Kvenland (before the Viking age - see below) and then Finland as part of the Swedish kingdom until it became an autonomous part of the Russian empire, and finally an independent nation 99 years ago.

Is Finland becoming a "grand dutchy" of the Saudi led (OIC) sharia Umma or will it keep its hard fought independence?


These guys are making sharia business in Finland.

From a Finnish high school book:

Islamissa ensin tulevat miehet, sitten tulevat hermafrodiitit ja vasta sitten tulevat naiset.
Nainen on epäpuhdas
Suura 5.6:

(Kulttuurit (Kulttuuriperintö ja identiteetti) Lukion elämänkatsomustieto 4 et 13 ET 4. Viimeksi muutettu 19.11.2012).

Klevius translation: First in islam are the men, then the hermaphrodites, and only then comes the women. The woman is unclean.

Klevius' Finland-Swedish Hobbit story


The Dragon of Evil, Tolkien, and Moomin Mum


 The Dragon of Evil in the Tolkien calendar by Finland-Swedish Tove Jansson (author of Moomin)

Everyone (except islamist muslims) seem to agree that islamism is evil. However, many, especially politicians and muslims, claim that islam is "a great and peaceful religion". From this we may conclude that islamism contains both islam and evil in an inseparable connection which poses the question how islam could possibly be without evil - and beyond criticism. Even more so when considering that the original spread of islam during more than hundred years (before it settled as sultanates simply sponging on slave business - the so called "golden age") was completely based on evil religiously "justified" robbery, slaughtering, raping and enslavement of the "infidels". Islam's problem is it foundation in evil medieval parasitism that it has now brought to the modern society.

The twisted logic that evil islam should be blinked as "islamism" has led to a variety of incomprehensible stand points. For example and ironically, because of muslim terrorists muslims now ask for extra protection against "anti-muslim sentiments" - on top of the general protection already in place. Why? Does this mean that non-muslim right-wing politicians also should get extra protection because of right-wing extremists? However, the worst twist of all is by far the Saudi based and steered (by the Saudi dictator family) all muslim's world organization OIC and its sharia declaration via UN.

 Klevius has no knowledge about J R Tolkien's view on islam. However, Klevius is convinced that J R Tolkien would have shared Klevius definition of evil based on Human Rights equality.

J R Tolkien's main hero since he was a boy and throughout his entire life was Kullervo in the Finnish epic Kalevala. Many characteristics of Kullervo can also easily be traced in Beowulf and Hamlet both of whom were Scandinavians from a time when Fennoscandia was known as Kvenland (see further down). This period is called Vendel time after a small village near Uppsala in eastern Sweden which at that time was populated by Finns and some old Nordic speaking bi-lingual "Finland-Swedes" (see more about this further down).

Klevius is convinced that Tove Jansson would have full heartedly approved of Tolkien's choice of such an ambiguous hero as Kullervo.

The official Tolkien calendar of 2016 (left) is illustrated by Finland-Swedish Tove Jansson (aka Moomin Mum).


Tove Jansson has also illustrated Swedish and Finnish books by Tolkien (right). However, she is most famous for her Moomin books and illustrations.






Peter Klevius wrote:

Friday, March 25, 2016

Klevius' Finland-Swedish Hobbit story



The Dragon of Evil, Tolkien, and Moomin Mum


 The Dragon of Evil in the Tolkien calendar by Tove Jansson

Everyone (except islamist muslims) seem to agree that islamism is evil. However, many, especially politicians and muslims, claim that islam is "a great and peaceful religion". From this we may conclude that islamism contains both islam and evil in an inseparable connection which poses the question how islam could possibly be without evil. Even more so when considering that the original spread of islam during more than hundred years (before it settled as sultanates simply sponging on slave business - the so called "golden age") was completely based on evil religiously "justified" robbery, slaughtering, raping and enslavement of the "infidels". Islam's problem is it foundation in evil medieval parasitism that it has now brought to the modern society.

The twisted logic that evil islam should be blinked as "islamism" has led to a variety of incomprehensible stand points. For example and ironically, because of muslim terrorists muslims now ask for extra protection against "anti-muslim sentiments" - on top of the general protection already in place. Why? Does this mean that non-muslim right-wing politicians also should get extra protection because of right-wing extremists? However, the worst twist of all is by far the Saudi based and steered (by the Saudi dictator family) all muslim's world organization OIC and its sharia declaration via UN.

 Klevius has no knowledge about J R Tolkien's view on islam. However, Klevius is convinced that J R Tolkien would have shared Klevius definition of evil based on Human Rights equality.

J R Tolkien's main hero since he was a boy and throughout his entire life was Kullervo in the Finnish epic Kalevala. Many characteristics of Kullervo can also easily be traced in Beowulf and Hamlet both of whom were Scandinavians from a time when Fennoscandia was known as Kvenland (see further down). This period is called Vendel time after a small village near Uppsala in eastern Sweden which at that time was populated by Finns and some old Nordic speaking bi-lingual "Finland-Swedes" (see more about this further down).

Klevius is convinced that Tove Jansson would have full heartedly approved of Tolkien's choice of such an ambiguous hero as Kullervo.

The official Tolkien calendar of 2016 (left) is illustrated by Finland-Swedish Tove Jansson (aka Moomin Mum).


Tove Jansson has also illustrated Swedish and Finnish books by Tolkien (right). However, she is most famous for her Moomin books and illustrations.




Klevius wrote:

Sunday, August 10, 2014

Finland-Swedish Moomin Mum Tove Jansson 100 years


Back then Hitler (the Germans) cried for more cake - today islam (the muslims) do the same!





This brave caricature, 'more cake' was made by Tove Jansson in Finland during a time when Hitler (the Germans) were considered friend of Finland in its war against Stalin's communist Soviet-union.


Here Tove Jansson with her longtime partner Tuulikki Pietilä


Tove Marika Jansson (9 August 1914 – 27 June 2001) was a Swedish-speaking novelist, painter, illustrator and comic strip author from Finland. For her contribution as a children's writer she received the Hans Christian Andersen Medal in 1966.

Tove Jansson is best known as the author of the Moomin books for children and the astonishing The True Deceiver for adults. The first Moomin book, The Moomins and the Great Flood, appeared in 1945, i.e. the same year Astrid Lindgren, an other world famous Swedish speaking author, published her first book about the Tomboyish Pippi Longstocking.

Like Klevius, Tove Jansson belongs to the tiny bilingual Finland-Swedish minority. In fact, access to her summer house on the pic passes a nearby place where Klevius used to live, neighboring a carpenter who used to build Moomin furnitures for Moominland.

However, unlike Klevius, Tove Jansson never had kids. It's even alleged that she felt slightly uncomfortable with kids. So where Klevius has been a family man in practice, Tove Jansson created her family environment as a fiction.

For more on this topic do visit Klevius' Love Letter to Edith Södergran (an other world famous Finland-Swede).

The little bright Hobbit girl and the giant blonde warrior

 There seems to be no way of avoiding the fact that the first truly intelligent modern humans arose in northern Eurasia. The art and genetic tracks (see below) are more than convincing albeit not yet visibly presented as such other than on Klevius book, blogs and sites so far (though the field is slowly but inevitably moving towards Klevius). 







 The people who got the new brain set up were short in stature as most Siberian people were until recently. However, when Seima-Turbino like phenomenons started (possibly even long before Seima-Turbino) big guys who had become blond in the north hunted for cute mongolic looking girls (compare Kalevala). Some of those girls possessed still a great chunk of the original super brain (compare the Denisova cave etc) so some of the kids produced with the blond giants turned up really smart. Their smartness together with a strong physical constitution in a sparsely populated river way landscape with small villages/camps constituted an ideal environment for nomadic robbery. And after some time some of these guys had collected enough financial and man power to go further south. Klevius will in detail explain this development later. Suffice to say that this is also the explanationary basis for why the Goths from the north managed to conquer the whole of Europe.



Klevius wrote:

Saturday, June 20, 2015

Klevius Midsummer quiz: How come that Klevius can read Beowulf but modern Brits can not?!


Klevius question to BBC: Why so much focus on Muhammad and so little on Beowulf?


The epic poem Beowulf, the masterpiece of Anglo-Saxon literature, was composed in pre-Viking time by an anonymous poet. It tells the story of a Scandinavian hero whose feats include battles with the fearsome monster Grendel and a fire-breathing dragon. It survives in a single manuscript dating from around 1000 AD. In form (e.g. alliteration) and content it follows much of  the Finnish Kalevala (pictured below). Not the least as how it's influenced by later Christian material.




The simple answer is that as a Finland-Swede Klevius happens to master not only Swedish and Finnish but also old Finland-Swedish dialects - and in an extension most old wordings based on Old Nordic (aka Old Norse) over an area covering all the Nordic countries (incl. Gotland) plus Netherlands, England, Scotland plus most of the north Atlantic islands east of Iceland.

In the 1990s when Klevius studied English at Stockholm University they offered a video recording of a play based on thousand year old English texts. To Klevius astonishment he immediately recognized  many familiarities with the  East-Nyland dialects Klevius had grown up with. So when two Norwegian linguists a couple of years ago stated that English is a Scandinavian language Klevius applauded them.

So what does this have to do with Midsummer? Well, it's not just linguistics but a load of other familiarities as well, not to mention the fire feasts which may even be traced back to the Celts. And remember that much/most pre-Christian cultural influences are shared within all the Nordic countries.

For a background take a look at Kvenland:


Klevius wrote

Thursday, August 07, 2014


Who were the most evil ones, muslims or Vikings?


While Yazidi people (the original monotheists from which Jews, Christians and muslims took their "faiths") and other non-muslims (and wrong-muslims) are raped, terrorized, slaughtered or forced to "convert" to islam, Ahmed and Warsi are busy defending the muslim terror organization Hamas




Take a look at the two faces in the middle of this pic that Klevius has used for many years to enlighten the problem with islam. They are both old pals fighting for political islam and against Human Rights - not necessarily for the parties they repesent. Ahmed is a muslim who uses Labor party in his jihad while Warsi uses the Conservative party in hers. They are both rooted in Pakistan (Kashmir area) and they have both been deeply involved in scandals that would have put a non-muslim far away from any political post. More about Warsi furthest down on this posting.


A glossy popular history magazine now describes plundering Medieval muslims and Vikings in completely opposite ways. Why?!


Whereas 'the caravan robbing muslims' (and that's what the magazine actually writes) are called 'the followers of a new faith' and their plundering in Mideast, Africa, Asia and Europe is positively described as 'successful conquest' (while the European defense is called 'evil crusaders'), the Vikings are just negatively dismissed as evil  'Barbarians' from the north who 'devastated the whole of Europe'.


Klevius history lesson about the muslims and the Vikings


The "extremist" parts of the Koran are exactly the ones that count for true muslims and historical records. Without following precisely those extremist parts of the Koran there wouldn't have been any islam at all.

However, although the Viking phenomenon as such was a direct consequence of muslim evilness, the forceful Vikings themselves didn't come out of the blue but represented an amplification of a pre-existing historical pattern that goes back to the Goths. And so far only Klevius (who is a late Goth/Finland-Swede) seems to have found the quite obvious source code for this transition.

In short it goes as follows:



This advanced sword from Vendel in Uppland Sweden is dated to a time before the Vikings when Uppland was still generally Finnish or at least bi-lingual. It's just one of many examples clearly revealing an alternative understanding of how the "barbarian" "Pagans" from the north could topple the Christian Roman empire. Although the sword is from Vendel time, i.e. after the fall of the Romans, it has to be put in context with the Goths (see below).

Birka (east of Stockholm) was established in the middle of the 8th century and thus being one of the earliest urban settlements in Scandinavia. Birka became part of a Baltic/Bay of Finland link in the pre-existing river and portage routes through Ladoga (Aldeigja) and Novgorod (Holmsgard) to the Byzantine Empire and the parasitic islamofascist Abbasid slave Caliphate.


The Goths





Acknowledgement: It's extremely problematic and even embarrassing for Klevius as a Finland-Swede, and as a person who brags about self-criticism being his main scientific tool, to end up with his own ethnicity as having been a major global player in the past. However, there are some mitigating excuses. So for example, what made some Finland-Swedes to become Goths and Vikings etc. were not necessarily the most sought after human characteristics. Moreover, those Finland-Swedes who didn't participate became today's tiny and on the verge of extinction Finland-Swedish community, linguistically bullied by the Finns (language) as well as the Swedes (accent/dialects).


Btw, dear reader, why don't you dare to comment, ask questions etc? Isn't the topic interesting and challenging enough, or is it because you're a coward and don't want to be known as reading something critical of islam, the worst ideological crime ever against humanity?






The oldest runic inscription found is some 600 years before the Viking age - and it is Finnish (or more probably Finnish-Old Nordic, i.e. what Klevius terms Finland-Swedish)


This is the oldest runic (Futark) inscription found. It says HARJA which is exactly the same as 'harja', meaning comb or , brush or ridge, in modern Finnish. The word is etymologically very old and had this Finnish form when the comb was made, i.e. it cannot be confused with some non-Finnish interpretation. Moreover, the word is found in all sister languages. The possibly related Baltic (or other) words do not resemble it at all neither now nor back then. The comb was found in Denmark and is dated to 160 CE (same time as the birth of Fornjotr, king of Kvenland and Gotland). However, also keep in mind that the combs owner also spole old Nordic.

Warning! There are many confused "scientists" out there emotionally trying to dismiss the Nordic origin of the Goths. I even stumbled on one who thought that different spellings would mean different groups. Spellings etc don't matter here. Just like 'Vikings' the 'Goths' is more of a concept than a specific ethnicity - just like 'muslims', except for the fact that muslim evilness is still kept alive under the cover of 'religion'.

The name 'Goth' (in its many variants) reflects the fact that it's not only thoroughly anchored in a Finnish-Old Nordic geographical/linguistic area and context but also that Gothic is linguistically puzzling if you don't see it as an Uralic colored form of Old Nordic. Moreover, genetics is still in its cradle and hence an extremely fragile tool. Only very crude main chronologies can so far be established and even shallow dives result in progressive guesswork at best, no matter how fancy math and graphs are produced. Klevius will explain more on this exciting topic later. However, so far nothing in genetics seems to disprove Klevius' analysis.


To understand the confusing picture about Finnish-Old Nordic relations that seems to emerge, one has to consider the relation between Indoeuropean and Uralic/Finnish languages. Both groups stem from geographically overlapping areas. However, whereas the former was more sedentary and farming oriented the latter was older and more rooted in a hunter-gatherer context.

As we all know agricultural societies usually gained more wealth and population than nomads etc. So when they moved north the Germanic tribes tended to follow a path more favorable for farming (Germany, Denmark and southern Sweden). This is how the linguistic map evolved in northern Europe, divided between the Finnish/Uralic related and Germanic/Indoeuropean tribes.


The Langobards - an example of how a tiny amount of Finland-Swedes (Kvens) conquered Europa


The Lombards or Langobards (Germanic word meaning the 'long-bearded' or the 'long-boarded') Latin: Langobardī, Italian Longobardi), were a north Germanic (Gothic?) tribe traceable to Gotland (Scadanan) who ruled Italy from 568 to 774.

Paul the Deacon wrote in the Historia Langobardorum that the Lombards descended from a small tribe called the Winnili (or Vinnili or Finnili) who dwelt in southern Scandinavia (Scadanan, i.e. Gotland) before migrating to seek new lands. In the 1st century AD they formed part of the Suebi*, in northwestern Germany. By the end of the 5th century they had moved into the area roughly coinciding with modern Austria north of the Danube river, where they subdued the Heruls and later fought frequent wars with the Gepids. The Lombard king Audoin defeated the Gepid leader Thurisind in 551 or 552; his successor Alboin eventually destroyed the Gepids at the Battle of Asfeld in 567.

* From Proto-Germanic *swēbaz, either based on the Proto-Germanic root *swē- meaning "one's own" people, or on the third-person reflexive pronoun; or from an earlier Indo-European root *swe-. The etymological sources list the following ethnic names as also from the same root: Suiones, Semnones, Samnites, Sabelli, Sabini, indicating the possibility of a prior Indo-European ethnic name, "our own people". Ultimately the word may also be related to 'sib' with similar meaning.


Following this victory, Alboin decided to lead his people to Italy, which had become severely depopulated after the long Gothic War (535–554) between the Byzantine Empire and the Ostrogothic Kingdom there. The Lombards were joined by numerous Saxons, Heruls, Gepids, Bulgars, Thuringians, and Ostrogoths, and their invasion of Italy was almost unopposed. By late 569 they had conquered all the principal cities north of the Po River except Pavia, which fell in 572. At the same time, they occupied areas in central and southern Italy. They established a Lombard Kingdom in Italy, later named Regnum Italicum ("Kingdom of Italy"), which reached its zenith under the 8th-century ruler Liutprand. In 774, the Kingdom was conquered by the Frankish King Charlemagne and integrated into his Empire.



Vikings












From Altai to Gotland, Sami, God, Vikings, Shakespeare and Tolkien


Klevius etymology and history remarks relating to the Britain-Scandinavia connection: The ancient Persian (which is extremely young compared to Uralic) word for god 'khoda' connects to the even more ancient Finnish 'koti' and Finno-Ugric 'kota' (=home/house/seed vessel - see Klevius definition of religion and the Vagina gate), Saami 'goahti'. German Gott (god) and Swedish gott (good) as well as Gotland (pronounced Gottland), the island in the Baltic sea that constituted a (the?) main Viking hub in their slave trade with Jews and muslims.

Gotland in particular is famous as the probable ancestral home of the Goths: "a Gothic population had crossed the Baltic Sea before the 2nd century AD, reaching Scythia at the coast of the Black Sea in modern Ukraine where Goths left their archaeological traces in the Chernyakhov culture. In the 5th and 6th centuries, they became divided as the Visigoths and the Ostrogoths, and established powerful successor-states of the Roman Empire in the Iberian peninsula and Italy. Crimean Gothic communities appear to have survived intact in Crimea until the late 18th century.



Hamlet was aGoth

The father of Shakespeare's prototype for Hamlet was a Goth from the Gothenburg area in Sweden (were Klevius father also happened to be born). These Goths came originally from Gotland via those very same waterways that were shaped already some 9,000 years ago, hence connecting the Baltic Sea with Doggerland/North Sea.

Gotland was also the home port and treasure island for the Vikings because it naturally connected West and East via Staraja Ladoga southeast of Finland on the river way down to the south. Gotland has revealed the biggest hoards of Viking age old Arab/islamic silver coins in Northern Europe.

Immediately north of Staraja Ladoga is the homeland of the Finnish national epic Kalevala which Tolkien based his writing on.

The world's oldest fishing net is found in southeastern Finland and is some thousand years older than Cheddar man the "oldest Brit".

Bromme culture existed in what is today's Sweden already 11,700–11,000 bp.

As a curiosity it might be noted that film director Ingmar Bergman lived most of his life on Gotland where some of his most powerful movies were filmed.

In conclusion one might well argue that the Baltic Sea has been a main hub since the birth of modern humans. 












The first version at the top made 1583 and below how it looks today.
The sword held over the lion's head represents the West whereas the one below the lion represents islam (via Khazars, Bolgars, Ottomans etc. - see text below).




Finland/Kvenland - the home of Kalevala and the Vikings

Background 


Precisely because the farming old Swedes were more numerous and wealthier than the Finnish speaking nomads, the original Finland-Swedish Vikings became "Swedisized". As a consequence the later Viking age looked more "Swedish". The oxymoron "Norwegian Vikings", however, has no place at all in history because neither Norwegian language nor Norwegians existed at that time.

Unlike muslims who only copied/stole (incl. "converts") what others had made possible, the Vikings really contributed something new.
 
Finland has two official languages, Swedish and Finnish. Finland is also one of the most secularized countries in the world. Finland (and huge parts of what is now Sweden and Norway) was Kvenland before the Christian crusades after which it became connected as part of Sweden for some 600 years until the 1808-9 war against Russia after which Finland became an autonomous Grand Duchy in the Russian Empire until Finland's independence 6, December 1917.

After the 1808-9 war the Swedish speaking intellectuals started a campaign, "we are no Swedes anymore, and we don't wanna be Russians - so let's be Finns". This strive made many a Finland-Swede translate their name into Finnish. It also resulted in the collection of the Kalevala epos (which Tolkien used as a basis for his stories). However, Elias Lönnroth's Kalevala was heavily influenced by a monotheist understanding. Luckily Juha Pentikäinen and others have now initiated a rewriting of the text clean from Christian monotheist influences.

Due to its location Finnish (and Saami) possesses extremely old words still in use (see below). And due to the interaction between old Nordic and Finnish a pattern emerged that can still be seen stretching from Finland all the way to Iceland (see below). 

No one knows the true origin of the name Kvenland. However, Klevius qualified guess is based on its history of Nordic (and Finnish) speaking (agrarian) coastal Finns robbing beautiful girls with mongoloid characteristics (which pattern you can also trace in reading Kalevala) from its Saami and Finnish speaking neighbors. Raids with light boats was a Finnish specialty inherited from the Finnish and Russian water ways they still frequented (see Origin of Vikings). And when they heard (from the Volga Bolgars and the Jewish Khazars etc) about the enormous demand and price the muslim caliphate paid for these kind of girls the commerce quickly changed from furs to walking girls.

Due to the mix of old Nordic speaking males and Finnish speaking women an early bilingual traditon was born, which helped dealing with both Swedes and Finnish speaking "Russians". At the beginning of the Viking age the "Russians" spoke Finnish which was the main language in what is now northern and mid Russia. This also explains how Fornjotur could be the King of both Finland and Gotland as well as how Rus could become so friendly with the pre-Russians that they asked him for protection against other Vikings, Jews (Khazars) etc. 

Finland has for long suffered from what Klevius calls a mongoloid complex (2003). In 1952, only seven years after the end of Finland's disastrous connection with Germany in the World War 2, apart from having its first Olympics the nation celebrated the 17-year old Armi Kuusela's victory in the Miss Universe "beauty" contest, thus finally releasing the Finns from what was considered a traumatic connection with the East and its Russian/mongoloid inhabitants.



Klevius' ethnicity


The tiny (some 300,000) Finland-Swedish ethnic minority has, apart from the tiresome, bragging and annoying islamophobe named Klevius, produced such names as Edith Södergran (modernist poet), Westermarck (anthropology), Jean Sibelius (music), Georg Henrik von Wright (Wittgenstein's successor), Lasse Wiren (athletics - double-double Olympic winner on 5,000m and 10,000m), Lindberg (music - Kraft etc), Linus Thorvald (Linux), etc etc.

This list clearly implies a Finland-Swedish complex or something (see Inside Klevius mind).


Why surprised about the fact that English is a Nordic language? Klevius has informed about it for almost a decade on the web!


* When Klevius shakes hand with native English speakers he loves to point out that 'finger', 'hand', and 'arm' all are Swedish words with exactly the same spelling and not too different pronunciation. This usually produces a nice "really". However, when he also points out that most of the non-Latin words in English also are Swedish a brief uncertain and incredulous retreat from the topic is noticeable. And, now finally the self-evident fact that even grammar is equal has been pointed out even by others.

English is a Scandinavian/Nordic (Fennoscandian*) language


* No one knows for how long Old Swedish/Nordic language(s) has been spoken in Finland. This is why not only the Scandinavian part but the whole Fennoscandian peninsula ought to be included.


Jan Terje Faarlund, professor of linguistics at the University of Oslo. "Obviously there are many English words that resemble ours. But there is something more: its fundamental structure is strikingly similar to Norwegian.

Klevius (who understands all Nordic languages incl. Finnish and most dialects): Norwegian language emerged after the Viking period (see Origin of Vikings). Its predecessor, i.e. what is called "Old Norse" but perhaps rather should be called Old Swedish or Old Nordic, is rooted in Kvenland from the cross pollination of Finnish and Nordic Germanic. Kvenish today is still very close to Finnish (more so than e.g. Estonian) yet it also contains such pecularities as meiðän ('our') which is simply meidän in Standard Finnish with a normally sounding d instead of the English sounding ð.


Kvenland (Womanland) from Finno-Ugric/Uralic to Old Swedish/Scandinavian/Nordic*


*aka "Old Norse" which might lead associations to Norway although there were no Norwegian speakers around long after the Viking age (see Origin of Vikings).

Kvenland, aka Cwenland, Kænland, Queenland, Kvinnoland, Womanland etc, is an ancient name for an area in Fennoscandia. Compare Swedish 'Kvinna' (woman) and English 'Queen' as well as Norwegian 'kone' (woman) Swedish 'kön' (sex) and English 'kin' (yes, we have Indoeuropean 'gen' but so what, where did 'gen' emerge?).

There exists a persistent "wikimyth" that Finnish language in Sweden and Norway are just a few hundred years old when in fact it's thousands of years old but due to national romanticism was explained away as caused by late immigration only.

As I already said, no one knows for sure why it was called Kvenland. However, a strong hypothesis is that the name reflects sex-slave hunt for beautiful white girls/women who were most valued on the muslim slave markets by the islamic mosques. So the Finnish empire may have existed long before it was called Kvenland.The name was just applied from the outside as a marker of its notorious records.

Kvenland appears in written sourdes from  the 9th century, and from Icelandic sources written in the 12th and 13th centuries. Since the 17th century most historians have located Kvenland somewhere around or near the Bothnian Bay, in the present-day regions of Swedish Norrbotten and Finnish Ostrobothnia as well as part of Norway where there are still a Kvenish population. The traditional East Finnish name of this area was Kainuu, and it has been suggested that the Scandinavian name of Kvenland and Kainuu share etymological roots.


Around 890 CE a Northman named Ohthere visited King Alfred of Wessex who had his stories written down by Orosius.

According to Ohthere, the Norðmanna land was very long and very narrow ... and to the east are wild mountains, parallel to the cultivated land. Finnas inhabit these mountains ... Then along this land southwards, on the other side of the mountain, is Sweden ... and along that land northwards, Kvenland (Cwenaland). The Kvens (Cwenas) sometimes make depredations on the Northmen over the mountain, and sometimes the Northmen on them.
There are large [freshwater] meres amongst the mountains,[2] and the Kvens carry their ships over land into the meres, and thence make depredations on the Northmen; they have small and very light ships.








Fornjotur* (ca 160-250 CE), the Finnish King of Kvenland and Gotland, and ancestor of the Swedish Ynglinga tree and William I of England

* there is much reason to believe that the legend about Fornjotur has more truth underneath than for example the myth about Mohammed (who was allegedly born 400 years later). Hugh Kennedy (professor of Arabic language and Arabic history): "Before Abd al-Malik (caliph 685-705) Mohammed (dead 632) is never mentioned on any official document whatsoever..."


Fornjotur, Fornjót, Fornjótr) was a king of Finland. His children are Ægir (the ruler of the sea), Logi (fire giant) and Kári (god of wind).
The name has often been interpreted as forn-jótr "ancient giant", and sometimes identified with the primeval giant Ymir. But it is also possible, as was suggested by Müller (1818), that it is one of a well-established group of names or titles of gods in -njótr "user, owner, possessor", which would make Fornjótr the "original owner".



How did primary stress on first syllable come from Kvenland to Iceland?



There was of course another language, Kvenish-Finnish, that was present in Fennoscandia and somehow influenced the ancient Norse language.

Finnish possesses some of the oldest words in the world, some of them still in their original Uralic form. In fact, the old Finnish stem seems to be closer to its distant roots than other Finno-Ugric languages despite the fact that Finland has been the most modernized of them all.


Klevius linguistic question: How was the strange affinity between Indoeuropean Icelandic and Uralic Finnish created between Kvenland and Iceland?


Whereas Indoeuropean languages are strongly rooted in a Neolithic agricultural past Uralic languages are rooted in hunting/gathering societies i.e. pre-Neolithic.

Indoeuropean Old Norse developed into "Western" and "Eastern" variants. Western Norse covered Norway and overseas settlements in Iceland, Greenland, the Faroe Islands and the Shetland Islands, while Eastern Norse developed in Denmark and south-central Sweden and coastal Finland.

The language of Iceland and the non Finnish or Saami Fennoscandia was practically the same up until the 14th century, when they started to deviate from each other.

During the late Old Norse period and this period there was also a considerable adoption of Middle Low German vocabulary. Similar development in grammar and phonology happened in Swedish and Danish, keeping the dialect continuum in continental Scandinavia intact, but with greater dialectal variation. This process did not, however, occur in the same way in Faroese and Icelandic. These languages remain conservative to this day, when it comes to grammar and vocabulary, so mutual intelligibility with continental Scandinavia was lost.




The Uralic languages belong to a single Eurasian belt of agglutinative languages together with the Altaic languages streching from Fennoscandia in the west to Japan in the east


Not only typological parallelism, but also stress on the first syllable as well as lack of third person pronoun sex segregation (e.g. Finnish 'hän' instead of 'he/she' apartheid) is accompanied by areal adjacency, allowing us to speak of a distinct Ural-Altaic language area and language type we may call Eurasiatic.

Some roots for Eurasiatic: mi (what?, mi/kä or mi/tä in modern Finnish), pälä (two), akʷā (water), tik (one or finger), konV (arm 1), bhāghu(s) (arm 2), bük(ä) (bend or knee), punče (hair), p'ut'V (vagina or vulva), snā (smell or nose), kamu (seize or squeeze), and parV (the verb to fly)

Modern Finnish preserves old words equal or almost equal more often than other languages

Examples of reconstructed Proto-Uralic words:

Body parts and bodily functions: *ïpti hair on the head, *ojwa head, *śilmä eye (same as in modern Finnish), *poski cheek (same as in modern Finnish), *kä(x)li tongue ('kieli' in modern Finnish), *elä- to live ('elää' in modern Finnish), *ka(x)li- to die ('kuolla', and 'kuoli' in imperf), *wajŋi breath (in Finnish 'vainaja' means a dead), *kosi cough, *kunśi urine ('kusi' in modern Finnish), *küńili tear ('kyynele' in modern Finnish), *se(x)ji pus.

Kinship terms: *emä mother (same in modern Finnish), *čečä uncle ('setä' in modern Finnish), *koska aunt, *mińä daughter-in-law ('miniä' in modern Finnish), *wäŋiw son-in-law ('vävy' in modern Finnish).

Verbs for universally known actions: *meni- to go ('mennä', 'meni' in imperf in modern Finnish), *toli- to come ('tulla', 'tuli' in imperf in modern Finnish), *aśkili- to step ('askel' is step in modern Finnish), *imi- to suck ('imi' is sucked in modern Finnish), *soski- to chew, *pala- to eat up ('pala' is a piece in modern Finnish), *uji- to swim ('ui' is swim in imperf in modern Finnish), *sala- to steal ('salata' means to hide in modern Finnish), *kupsa- to extinguish ('kupsata' used for to die in modern Finnish).

Basic objects and concepts of the natural world: *juka river ('joki' in modern Finnish), *toxi lake, *weti water ('vesi/vettä' in modern Finnish), *päjwä sun (same but also day in modern Finnish), warmth, *suŋi summer ('suvi' in modern Finnish), *śala- lightning ('salama' in modern Finnish), *wanča root ('vanka', 'vankka' means steady in modern Finnish), *ko(x)ji birch, *ka(x)si spruce ('kuusi' in modern Finnish), *sïksi Siberian pine, *δ'ï(x)mi bird cherry

Elementary technology: *tuli fire (same in modern Finnish), *śüδi coal, *äjmä needle, *pura drill ('pora' in modern Finnish), *jïŋsi bow ('jousi' in modern Finnish), *jänti bow string, *ńï(x)li arrow ('nuoli' in modern Finnish), *δ'ümä glue ('liima' in modern Finnish), *lïpśi cradle, *piksi rope, *suksi ski (same in modern Finnish), *woča fence.

Basic spatial concepts: *ïla below ('alla' in modern Finnish), *üli above ('yli' in modern Finnish), *wasa left ('vasen' in modern Finnish), *pälä side.

Pronouns: *mun I (meaning mine in modern Finnish), *tun you ('sun' meaning yours in modern Finnish), *ke- who (same in modern Finnish), *mi- what (same in modern Finnish).

The reconstructed vocabulary is compatible with a Mesolithic culture (bow, arrow, needle, sinew, but also rope, fence, cradle, ski), a north Eurasian landscape (spruce, birch, Siberian pine), and contains interesting hints on kinship structure.



The Vikings were bilingual (Finland-Swedes) Goths who could communicate both with the Finnish tribes as well as with the old Nordic/German people



In the Viking world the Jewish slave empire (Chazaria) played an important role in establishing the slave raid and trade system that served the enormous islamic hunger for white sex slaves.





Karelia's old coat of arms.



Karelia bordered the medieval Novgorod republic which was ransacked by muslim Bolgars who hunted for slaves. The southern part became an important hub in the islamic slave finance as Vikings and Kazar Jews etc served the islaic caliphate in the south and later on the Ottoman Turks.


Fair skinned female sex slaves from northern Europe were the by far most valuable according to islamic price lists

(see more about this here)



Most of what you read about Vikings on the web is wrong. The Viking age started already before 750 in the east (because of islamic demand for sex slaves). So forget about Britain 786. Also remember that if you see the words Norway or Norwegians mentioned re. Vikings then throw the link/book away. There was no Norway or Norwegians or a Norwegian language during the Viking age! Educate yourself on Origin of the Vikings.

In 882, Rurik's successor, Oleg of Novgorod, conquered Kiev and founded the state of Kievan Rus.




After the Kievan Russian state began to disintegrate in 1132, slaves became much more numerous as inhabitants of neighboring East Slavic principalities (much of the territory between Poland-Lithuania and the Volga River) became fair game for enslavement.

Jewish merchants took East Slavic slaves from Novgorod to western destinations. Other East Slavic slaves were continuously "harvested" by the Turkic peoples (Tatars) inhabiting the southern and eastern frontiers of Rus' and subsequently sold to buyers mainly in the Arab countries.

The Mongol invasions into Rus' from 1236-1240 accelerated the disintegration of Kievan Rus' that had commenced in 1132.

Continuous Tatar slave raids replaced those of the pre-1240 Turkic peoples who had roamed the Ukranian steppe. In these centuries the word "slave" was borrowed from the ethnonym "Slav."

During the ensuing period of the "Tatar yoke" (1237-1480), the export of slaves through Novgorod continued and the Novgorodian slave market at the intersection of Slave and High Streets was the most active business locale in the entire Republic of Novgorod, which encompassed much of Russia north of the Volga to the White Sea.


The Crimean Tatars had converted to islam in the 1300s and in 1475 the Crimean Khanate became a protectorate of the Ottoman Empire while itself still clinging to power over the Duchy of Muscovy.  In 1480, the Muscovites threw off the "Tatar Yoke" and began the unification of Russia under Slavic rulers.  By 1503, those rulers would declare Russia the Third Roman Empire, and take the title of Tsar.

The Crimean Tatars made use of their strategic position between the Ottomans and the Russians and supplied slaves for the Ottoman Janissary corps from the neighboring peoples to an enormous extent yet to be fully mapped.



Greedy rulers either married a muslim and naively agreed* to convert or just found islam the perfect sword for evil but profitable slave finance


* Islam is an evil dead end. A totalitarian harpoon that has only one direction unless it's stopped. This is one of the many reasons why islam is completely out of sync with Human Rights - a fact that not only Klevius but also OIC has realized!

Little is known about the timeline of the islamization of Inner Asia and the Turkic peoples who lay beyond the bounds of the caliphate. Around 7th century and 8th century, there were some states of Turkic peoples like Turkic Khazar Khaganate and Turkic Turgesh Khaganete who fought against the caliphate in order to stop Arabization and islamization in Asia. From the 9th century onwards, the Turks (at least individually, if not yet through adoption by their states) began to convert to islam. The Bulgars of the Volga, to whom the modern Volga Tatars trace their islamic roots, are noted to have adopted islamic evil early on. When the Friar William of Rubruck visited the encampment of Batu Khan of the Golden Horde, who had recently completed the Mongol invasion of Volga Bulgaria, he noted "I wonder what devil carried the law of Machomet there".



Different political functions of the islamic myth to legitimate power



Quite contrary to the populist academic discourse that within an islamic worldview, the production of "eventually" correct ritual behavior can be a gateway for "the grace of Allah" to produce "correct belief", the crude reality of islam's own tenets points clearly - and without the slightest anomaly from non-islamic history in sight - to a profitable parasitic formula crudely chiseled on pre-existing Judaic dogmas. This formula, which in one sweep eliminates otherwise "puzzling" historical events, goes like this (taken from www.klevius.info):

The root formula of Islam (Klevius 2001)

Slavery+"infidel" racism+sex segregated rapetivism+anti human rights Sharia/apostasy ban.

Why isn't the worst crime ever against humanity criminalized, but instead protected by the very Human Rights islam opposes?!




Converts to islam don't have to understand anything to be a "good muslim" simply because accepting totalitarian islam is the only proof needed. However, other muslims might not approve of it...