Why was the spoked wheel invented in Siberia, and why was PIE born out of Uralic? Peter Klevius: Because of intelligent mongolic women.

 

Only Peter Klevius interdisciplinary* science analysis of highly intelligent mongolic females having children with kurgan males, explains why the spoked wheel invention spread from Siberia to the rest of the world, and why Tocharian is related to Uralic Samojedic.

* Peter Klevius masters interdisciplinary science studies better than most because of high IQ, protected from "peer review" bias, and only focusing on what he is best at, i.e. low hunging scientific fruits. Peter Klevius intelligence was perhaps best described by the Finnish neuroscientist, J. Juurmaa, who in the 1990s wrote: "Teidän ajatuksen kulku on ilmavan lennokas ja samalla iskevän ytimekäs" which translated to English would mean something like: "Your train of thought is airy and lively and at the same time punchy to the point." This he wrote in a long letter answering Peter Klevius question about the effects on the visual cortex on individuals who have been blind from birth. This inquiry was part of Peter Klevius check up of his already published EMAH theory (1994), so to get a qualified confirmation that the "visual cortex" in born blinds is fully employed with other things than vision. Juurmaa's description of Peter Klevius is in line with philosopher Georg Henrik von Wright's 1980 assessment, and more importantly with Peter Klevius own experience, and perhaps most importantly when assessing consciousness and AI.

For most people trying to do interdisciplinary science studies are doomed to fail, or worse (as can be seen by much nosense published in Nature etc).

In anthropology and linguistics Peter Klevius benefited from learning archaic Swedish and Finnish as a child. The family he was kidnapped to at age two, spoke a very old type of Swedish. Moreover, many old neighbors and family friends/contacts were refugees from Karelia and therefore talked old Finnish, although their children talked modern Finnish. As a result Peter Klevius has no problem with whatever strange Swedish or Finnish dialects. Later he started seeing the obvious advantage of such bilingualism ("Finland-Swedish"), and connected it with the spread of the Goths, Vikings etc. 

As interdisciplinary science combines multiple academic disciplines to address complex problems, this approach not only allows for a more comprehensive understanding and innovative solutions, but also puts demands on the scientist that few can handle without slipping into personal bias. Except for a better than usual brain, and the self-evident need not to be affected by forces outside the scientific focus, the scientist must also possess the opposite, i.e. unbiased personal understanding of the topic. Ironically, the rigidity in a scientific field often shields it from wider perspectives while also may contribute to highly biased overall attitudes thoroughly wrapped in scientific jargon - compare e.g. the completely unfounded "out of Africa" mantra.

And...

Women from the NE brought intelligence and taught their daughters.

According to Peter Klevius, in the (forest) contact zone mongolic women were taken by kurgan men (compare Kalevala) and produced more intelligent offspring, because, according to Peter Klevius, the sparsely populated north had preserved much of the original HSS intelligence that then spread/mixed over the world in diluted form. And when Peter Klevius wrote Origin of the Vikings 2005/2006 he based it on islamic slave price lists (Abbasid starting around 750 AD - i.e. contemporary with the Staraja Ladoga site) which clearly pointed out fair-skinned slave girls from the north as the most valuable (excl. eunuchs). Due to much of European Russia back then speaking Finno-Ugric languages, this explains the success of the bilingual "Finland-Swedish" Vikings.

Mongolic mothers influenced bilingualism by talking their own Finno-Ugric mother tongue to their children, who later also learned Indo-European languages from the surrounding society, yet also affecting the development of Indo-European branches. Moreover, the non-mongolic forest dwelling kurgan people became the Finns who mixed with Saami women, hence creating two very different Finno-Ugric speaking phenotypes.

Proto-Indo-European (PIE) was spoken from approximately 4500 BCE to 2500 BCE.

 

A number of possible parallels of mostly Uralic, in particular Samoyedic, and Yeniseian to the typological traits of Tocharian sets it apart from PIE. This is in line with Peter Klevius view that PIE was the result of North Eurasian language(s) southern movement and mixing with existing southern languages (e.g. Kartvelian). Tocharians reached the Tarim Basin from the Afanasievo culture in Altai 3300-2500 BC.

No one knows what a word is in spoken language, which fact constitutes an enormous blur in linguistics.

According to Peter Klevius, languages started as the combination of meaning bearing single sounds. This polysynthetic transition became highly inflected and lacking words, which are the product of later writing systems. 

The next step produced a variety of agglutinative languages of which later on many became affected by writing systems and due introduction of words.  

Most languages except later Indo-European ones, are still to some extent agglutinative, depending on how words are defined. However, Tocharian is the only, but most important, exception in the Indo-European family. And, according to Peter Klevius (2006), while PIE "words" are only artificially linguistically reconstructed, modern Finnish still today contains real proto-Uralic "words", i.e. meaning bearing sounds and sound combinations (see e.g. Origin of the Vikings). Modern Finnish constitutes of only some 200-300 true Finnish words, while the rest are mostly loanwords. When the Finland-Swede Mikael Agricola in the 16th century translated Finnish sounds to orthography, this had a huge effect on what is now modern Finnish. On the pro-side came the fact that exact Finnish pronaunciation can be understood by anyone: 1) who always puts intonation on the first syllable, and: 2) who uses the alphabetic sounds correctly - i.e. not as the English mess. But do remember that u in Finnish is pronounced as o, while o is pronounced as å, and 3) that double vowels always mean long. Following this simple rules you can read out Finnish text as a native Finn. However, Mikael Agricolas linguistic intervention radically changed how Finns speak compared to Saami and many other related Finno-Ugric languages.

Iceage refuges were rooted in Eurasiatic - IE came much later.

Eurasiatic and Nostratic in the cross hair of rigid linguistic orthdoxy spiced with Western boosting of Indo-European (essentially the Old Nordic creole we call English).

According to Peter Klevius it's self-evident that PIE arose in an already existing agglutinative Eurasian context (Uralic, Jenisejan, Ket etc.). Listen to Edward Vajda.