Existencecentrism

Peter Klevius 'existencecentrism' (1992:21-22, ISBN 9173288411) vs 'existentialism'. Sören Kierkegaard: 'Human reason has boundaries'. Peter Klevius: There cannot be any boundaries because our existencecentrism excludes us from defining one. A boundary implies something outside it. However, our existencecentrism gives us no access outside our mind. This means existentialists conflate their "boundary" with a semantic construction inside their mind. Jean-Paul Sartre opposed defining human beings as primarily rational, and asserted that people make decisions based on subjective meaning rather than pure rationality. Peter Klevius: Humans can only be rational because they are strapped to the content of their mind. Irrationality and subjectivity only exist between human minds.
Dear reader, Google is (20241231) censoring all of Peter Klevius tousands of images, incl. his own drawing of his groundbreaking theory on consciousness and how the brain works from 1992-94, which was empirically proven correct by the birth (2006) of a unique set of craniopagus twins with coupled thalamuses (they can talk with eachother inside their head) but separate cortices (i.e. separate personaities) - an image that is constantly high up on other search engines!

Trying to understand the polarizing and warmongering without incl. the consequences of US 1971 $-theft - which are now coming home to roost because of China's superior R&D - is an equation without an x. From a pro-war politician's mouth always comes a copy of the original in US. US inflamed the existing racial tensions in Ukraine for the purpose of getting US nukes and US anti-nuke missiles on Russia's border, so to protect itself in its planned war against China - because only by creating a similar chaos as in WW2 on the Eurasian continent would US be able to continue its stolen dollar hegemony.
From US "exorbitant dollar privilege" (financial abuse of vulnerable countries - but the dollar still connected to gold) 1944-, to US financial fraud 1971- (US self-indulgent disconnection of the dollar value from gold after having spent too much on wars and space race etc.). US' "China threat" demonizing is now code for US own threat, i.e. US masking its own desperation when losing its 1971- stolen dollar hegemony because of China's growing high tech superiority. How many understand this simple truth - and how many blink it?! Before 1971 there was only one world-dollar (since Bretton Woods 1944). After the "Nixon chock" 1971 there were two: One for US dictated by US (Feds), and an other for the rest of the world, also dictated by US. And the difference was that the US-dollar made it possible for US to prosper despite trade deficit, because the rest of the world has paid the difference. Also do recognize that Roosewelt's similar move 1933 happened before the Bretton Woods agreement.
Why is a meritocratic, capitalism and trade supporting, Chinese president, with more than 2/3 approval rating, called a "dictator", while a wild capitalism and protectionism and anti-China sanctions and smearing supporting, militaristic warmongering US president with 1/3 of indirect votes on electors who were chosing among candidates chosen by the big money, is called "democratic"?! It seems that "Christian democracy" is a similarly empty but magic wording as is "the Atheist Communist dictatorship".
Forget about Nature! Here you get your by far most qualified and least biased (not steered by peer "reviews" or PC editors, but by super high IQ not corrupted by religion, politics or money) scientific overall understanding of evolution (1981), human evolution (1992-), consciousness (1992-94) and AI (1979-), and Human Rights (1979- incl. sex segregation). In his topics of scientific interest Peter Klevius has got highest possible recommendations from world leading professors on the topics. And no, the author has never been caught with mental problems, abuse or criminality, and has successfully fostered all of his children. So why presenting himself like this?! Simply because his best services to science can't get properly through via other media, and here it's often dismissed as "just a blogger's opinion" - which is quite rich when considering much peer reviewed nonsense PC "science" allowed on Nature! And non-scientific posts here of course utilize the same brain power.
Acknowledgement: Everything produced by Peter Klevius stands for those Universal Human Rights of 1948 which islam's main representative OIC rejected 1990!

Wednesday, August 26, 2026

Peter Klevius: Why did ancient "Egypt"* have to copy Sumerians when equally old South-American Caral pyramid civilization didn't have to copy anyone?!

* There was no ancient "Egyptian" "Memphis" or "Giza", simply because these names didn't exist back then. And the name Memphis is the English transliteration of a Greek version (Μέμφις) of an Egyptian word of uncertain origin which earliest possible guesswork etymology places it some 2500 years after the Giza pyramids. The name Giza is derived from Arabic (which didn't exist back then but some 3000 years later) Er-ges-her, meaning "beside the high," referring to the Great Pyramid, but its etymology may come from a Persian word meaning "castle".

Peter Klevius: Because, according to Peter Klevius evolution formula (1981, 1992, 1994, 2004, 2012), the brain gravity was (and still is) in NE Asia, it sipped through Beringia to the Americas and through Central Asia* to Persia/Iran, Middle East and eventually what is now Egypt.

* In a 1980 letter to G. H. von Wright (Wittgenstein's self-appoited successor at Cambridge) Peter Klevius wrote that civilization tracks seem to have come via Central Asia to Mideast. The letter is archived under Peter Klevius mother's maiden name, i.e. Peter Kotilainen. And in the 1992 book Resursbegär (Demand for Resources) Peter Klevius asked why the big Jinniushan human with a 1400 cc brain didn't manage to go to the moon despite having 200,000 years time to do so before we (HSS) came around.

Egyptology is a sub-group of the quasi-scientific afropology that Peter Klevius has thoroughly debunked.

According to Peter Klevius (1992 with latest update 2012), human evolutionary steps were created in the volatile SE Asian archipelago to the beat of accelerating climate oscillations, i.e. sea level changes and due changes in island fluctuations between steppe and jungle, which in turn led to those who had got bigger in the last low sea level (see Peter Klevius evolutionary flow chart) were forced back to the jungle and getting smaller, and only those surviving who could better pack their brains in smaller heads so to preserve the intelligence needed to survive. Low sea level (mainland connection) led to the tropical phenotype (small and dark skinned) following mainland tropics, while others went to the fat and protein rich north, where they got bigger, light skinned and cold adapted ("mongoloid"). 

 Peter Klevius: Why surprised?! After all, although $-freeloager (since 1971) US cannot make high quality chips but has to buy them from Chinese on the Chinese island of Taiwan, US is a master in using its stolen hegemony to block mainland China from importing tech from Taiwan and ASML that used to be available for all. And despite this sudden enormous handicap, China manages to beat US before finalizing even better chip machinery than ASML.

Although Chien-Shiung Wu was the world's leading physicist of her time, she was illtreated because of racist Sinophobia, and she never got a Nobel prize, and wasn't even mentioned in the Oppenheimer movie despite being the one who made the atom bomb possible. 
 

 Long before a tiny part at the mouth of the Mediterranean Nile delta - later called "Giza" and "Memphis"* - in what is a minuscule part of today's northern Egypt, started copying pyramids, these kind of structures were already made in Sumer**, Iran and China. 


* What is now called "Memphis" had some 6,000 inhabitants during the Old Kingdom.

** Watch up for the deliberate use of the Greek rooted "Mesopotamia" for the purpose of conflating non-Semitic Sumerians who founded the first civilization in Mideast, with the much later Semitic Akkadians. 

Ziggurats were massive pyramidal structure built in ancient Sumer and Iran beginning 4000 BCE.

However, the oldest pyramidal structures were made in NE China in the same area as the big Jinniushan woman skeleton 260-280 ka. The earliest pyramidal structure was found at the site of Niuheliang in Liaoning along the middle and upper reaches of the Laoha River and the Yingjin River north of Beijing and belongs to the Hongshan culture (4700 to 2900 BC).

This amphora is from 4800 BCE and much older than anything similar from Midest/"Egypt". 

However,

 this one that Wikipedia calls a 'red pot with two small "ear" handles', from the Chinese Peiligang culture, c. 6000–5200 BC, seems to be quite amphora like after Peter Klevius repairing of the (deliberately?) lousy image by Wikipedia.


Sumerian/Eurasian DNA in ancient "Egypt"


A 2025 DNA study revealed clear connections of a high ranking Old Kingdom individual with the Sumerians, and a 2017 analyses revealed higher affinities of mummies from Late New Kingdom, Ptolemaic, and Roman time with Near Eastern and European populations compared to modern Egyptians - which of course caused similar negative reactions among "egyptologists" as Homo floresiensis among afropologists.

DNA from ancient "Egypt", dating back to the Early Dynastic and Old Kingdom periods (~2855-2570 BCE) revealed that 20% traced back to West Asia, and particularly to Sumer.

And the 2025 study provides direct evidence of genetic ancestry related to the eastern Fertile Crescent in ancient "Egypt". It suggests there had been ancient migration flows from the eastern Fertile Crescent. In addition to the exchanges of objects and imagery (domesticated animals and plants, writing systems...) already observed. This suggests a pattern of wide cultural and demographic expansion from the Sumerian region, which affected both Anatolia and Egypt during this period.


China is rooted in a civilization history that stretches since the world's first pottery some 20,000 years ago. However, due to $-freeloader (since 1971) US media censorship and distortion about anything Chinese, most people in the West have an extremely biased view.

The Mediterranean Nile delta produced petroglyphs that later transformed into hieroglyphs which were then abandoned with the introduction of other script systems. However, a similar trajectory in China led to an unbroken development to the most sophisticated script ever and still in use. 

In China there have recently been discoveries of tortoise-shell carvings dating back to c. 6000 BCE, like 
Jiahu Script. 

The Banpo script are of course "debated" in the West if "complex enough" to qualify as writing. At Damaidi in the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, 3,172 cliff carvings dating to c. 6000–5000 BCE have been discovered, featuring 8,453 individual characters, such as the sun, moon, stars, gods, and scenes of hunting or grazing. 

These pictographs are reputed to be similar to the earliest characters confirmed to be written Chinese. If it is deemed to be a written language, writing in China will predate Sumerian cuneiform, long acknowledged as the first appearance of writing, by some 2,000 years.

Acknowledgement: Peter Klevius unique access to a bias free scientific realm (a blessing and a curse) is a combination of a high IQ brain*, lack of economic ties**, lack of religious or "spiritual" bias, and a life history starting with being kidnapped to an other country at age two and then at age 17 kicked back penniless to his country of birth, where he had to work instead of university. Add a deep interest in science ignited at age 13 by mathematician Clas-Olof Selenius (dad of Peter.s childhood friend Carl-Olof). This has made Peter Klevius an intellectual coward only picking low hanging fruits that are "forbidden" due to academic PC bias - and therefore often mistakenly seen as a bragger but actually making him the most cautious/humble scientist avoiding loose speculations, such as e.g. what is often happily published in Nature etc. fueled by biased peer reviews (see e.g. the chapter Science and References in Peter Klevius 1992 book Demand for Resources).

* Father (whom he never met) won Gothenburg (Sweden's chess capital) chess championship many times over four decades despite playing more for the fun of the public with spectacular queen offerings etc. It actually seems that he wasn't even interested in getting really serious with the game - which is in line with his other artistic activities such as painting etc. When Peter Klevius mother died she had ordered one of his paintings to Peter Klevius but somehow it disappeared before her last husbond Pauli Järvinen told him about it. It's still missing somewhere. Peter Klevius sister won IBM's talent test with IQ 167, and Finnish neuroscientist professor J. Juurmaa in a letter to Peter Klevius wrote: 'Ajatuksen kulkunne on ilmavan lennokas ja samalla iskevän ytimekäs', i.e. something like 'your train of thought is spaciously high-flying and at the same time punchily concise'.
 
** Only his 1981 article Resursbegär (Demand for Resources) was paid for (Fmk 500) mainly because Georg Henrik von Wright (Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge) liked it and convinced the editor in chief (Jan-Magnus Jansson) to publish it.

Read how Peter Klevius solved "the biggest mystery in science".

A recorded public time-line of Peter Klevius original research on evolution, consciousness, existencecentrism, anthropology and sociology 1979-2012 - and some thoughts about self-citation  

Read Peter Klevius in-depth research on The Psychosocial Freud Timeline.

Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024. 

Read how climate change made human evolution possible in SE Asian volatile archipelago - not on a continent like Africa

 Read how two craniopagus twins born 2006 solved the "greatest mystery in science" - and proved Peter Klevius theory from 1992-94 100% correct.  

 Read Peter Klevius thesis Pathological Symbiosis in LVU on how a hoax child-psychoanalytic concept is still used by the Swedish social state to abduct children on subjective grounds.  It also reveals (see email correspondens in appendix) how legislators were lured to pass a Human Rights violating law which was then blinked by ECHR because it was seen as below the "margin of appreciation". 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment